PAGE 172
the management of the bank’s affairs were in the hands of Kennedy and Sylvester exclusively. Jurors Fail to Bring in Verdict After 26 Hours Deliberation Wabasha, Minn., Dec. 14 – After being out for more than 26 hours the jury in the trial of Adolph Stoltz reported at 8:30 PM Sunday that they were unable to agree on a verdict and were discharged by Judge Karl Finkelnburg. County Attorney John R. Foley moved at once that the case be tried a second time at this term of the district court, but the court continued the case until the next regular term next May. Stoltz, who is at liberty on $5,000 bail, will be tried at that time on the same indictment under which he was tried at this term, that of receiving a deposit in a bank which he is alleged to have had good reason to know was insolvent, Mr. Foley said. There also are two charges of falsifying bank records pending against him. The trial, which was in several respects the most unusual in the annals of Wabasha county, lasted for nine days, going to the jury at 6 PM Saturday, after more than half a day had been consumed in the closing arguments of Mr. Foley for the state, J. W. Murdoch for the defense, and the court’s instructions. The jurors almost from the start of the balloting stood 8 to 4 for conviction, it was said, and were divided in the same way when the last ballot was taken. Shortly after 2 AM Sunday, it appeared that the jury might reach an agreement when they called for further instructions from the court. Judge Finkelnburg was summoned from the hotel where he had retired when it was evident that there was no immediate prospect of a verdict, and the opposing attorneys, the defendant, and court officers hastily gathered in the court room. The jurors then inquired of the court whether it would be possible form them to bring in a verdict with a suggestion for clemency or with a recommendation that a fine rather than a prison sentence be imposed. Judge Finkelnburg informed them however, that it was their sole duty to determine the facts in the case and that the matter of punishment, if any were to be fixed, was the function of the court. It was not proper for them to compromise in reaching a decision, he said, and any juror who was convinced that the defendant was not guilty should not vote for conviction. From that time on, it was reported, the jury was hopelessly deadlocked and continued their deliberations for 18 more hours without sleep until they were dismissed. Eloquence and persuasiveness featured addresses to the jury of Mr. Foley and Mr. Murdoch, each of whom spoke for nearly two and one-half hours. Each of them made as the background of his plea the contrast between the peace and quiet and safety of the community at Plainview in the early part of the year, and the storm which
Previous: Page 171. |
|
* SOURCE: Manzow, Ron (compiler), "The Sylvester Family of Plainview, Minnesota - a collection of information taken from the Plainview News, other newspapers, letters, and diaries beginning in 1884": Plainview Area History Center, 40 4th St. S.W., Plainview, MN 55964. Compiled in 2001.
NOTE: from Ron Manzow, December 2001: "Feel free to reproduce the pages for anyone who wants a copy. It was
compiled to be shared... All I ask is that they consider sending a check to the [Plainview Area] History Center to help us out. That
should be enough."
Howder; © 1995-2011 All Rights Reserved. Last Updated February 14, 2011.